Turnaround Postulates

By Aparna C P

A note on smooth transition from traditional systems to next-generation systems.

Is there a way to introduce turnaround postulates to refine a system that is on its edge? An interesting proposition to address the current system of chaos and uncertainty is to understand the basic intellectual and social values on which the system stands. With due respect and honour to all the professionals who have worked tirelessly for decades to get the system going on the path of utility and goodness, a stage is set for the new generation to build a future with turnaround technology, management, strategy and philosophy. How does the present population perceive the situation and come up with solutions that are both viable and sustainable?

Assumptions & Beliefs

Turnaround postulates is concerned with the development of a framework that aides in smooth transition from traditional systems to next generation systems. An insight into the minds of torchbearers and toiling individuals gives a picture that is worth more than a thousand words. A brief survey is necessary to be taken to find out the priorities and value systems possessed by the professionals so as to develop a social model that is consistent with their requirements. For centuries, many scientists, social thinkers and philosophers have contributed to theories and models that have a significant impact when considered during planning and policy making. Along with existing theories, a place to understand the current mindsets and propose postulates is the first and the foremost requirement of the system.

The system as it is today believes in “asking individuals a question that they would ask themselves.” [In such a scenario, it has been shown statistically that 70% of the sample remains silent.]  Apparently, this is good as long as they are in a position to prove what they believe in. But if what they believe in cannot be proved, it is difficult and problematic to chart a path ahead with all the resources at hand. An interesting and the most useful workaround is to make way that not only fulfils the needs of an individual but also at large finds solutions to the problems faced by near and dear ones.

As today’s fields of specialisation are separated by a thin boundary line, it is time for the unification of such research areas that can have a significant effect in creating synergistic teams. The turnaround postulates may consider the systems such as collaborative, educational, economic, financial, ethical, social, recreational, spiritual, religious, technological, and so on in order to create awareness for the same in the workplaces. A broad framework on the systems along with an in-depth analysis on the nature of their impact is essential for the transition.

Independence vs Interdependence

It is not only important to be independent but also be interdependent in order to achieve the goals. Independence and interdependence should be the basis of holistic well-being of individuals, families, societies and organisations.  In order to achieve a successful system, priorities between two individuals and also between an individual and the workplace setup should match. For a smooth progression of work, a lot depends on the interplay of power and freedom in a setup. The power exercised and freedom to act is an interesting phenomenon observed between two entities that are independent and also interdependent for a cause. The motives are clear, the reasons are rational, actions are verifiable and behaviours are ethical.  

In the current context, a volatile environment presents interesting opportunities at a certain risk. To circumvent the nature of risk and be actively involved in the workflow requires optimism and strong determination. Instead of finding the answers from the source of the problem, an alternative approach should be introduced to tackle the mammoth problem. A systematic but free of single point breakdown should be encouraged for further investigation. An innovative system automatically develops when guided by principles that are development oriented but free of fear, pressure and guilt. Finally, one has to still believe in evolution despite uncertainty in order to achieve the common goal.

This article is inspired from the book "What We Believe But Cannot Prove" by John Brockman.